2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1966 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Corolla. (58 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1655 kg more than 1966 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 433 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Toyota Corolla. (77 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1966 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Commander | Corolla |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1076 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 61 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |