2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 723 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Commander | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |