2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1967 Renault 8
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1967 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 653 kg more than 1967 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1967 Renault 8 | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Commander | 8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 38 L |