2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1603 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (454 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (38 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Commander 1967 Suzuki Fronte
Make Jeep Suzuki
Model Commander Fronte
Year Released 2009 1967
Engine Size 4701 cc 356 cc
Horse Power 305 HP 20 HP
Engine RPM 5650 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 454 Nm 38 Nm
Torque RPM 3950 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2043 kg 440 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 3000 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1300 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 1970 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 66 L