2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 148 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (320 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Commander | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |