2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1975 MG MGB
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 MG MGB would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1975 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1975 MG MGB.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 MG MGB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 MG MGB. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1975 MG MGB has manual transmission. 1975 MG MGB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 1975 MG MGB | |
| Make | Jeep | MG |
| Model | Commander | MGB |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 80.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.7:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
