2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1981 Audi 4000
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1981 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1981 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | Commander | 4000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 358 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 527 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2550 mm |