2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1981 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1981 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1981 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1981 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mercury Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1981 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Commander | Lynx |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2400 mm |