2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 18 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP) has 218 more horse power than 1981 Renault 18. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jeep Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (453 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (181 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1981 Renault 18 | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Commander | 18 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 453 Nm | 181 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1410 mm |