2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (72 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1178 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jeep Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 423 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (104 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1982 Renault 9 has manual transmission. 1982 Renault 9 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Commander | 9 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 358 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 527 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2490 mm |
