2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (229 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1535 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (410 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Jeep | Zastava |
Model | Commander | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2305 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2160 mm |