2009 Jeep Commander vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (582 HP) has 353 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Commander. (229 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 3 kg more than 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (773 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Commander. (410 Nm). This means 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Commander | T V-12 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 7255 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 582 HP |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 773 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2305 kg | 2302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2810 mm |
