2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1024 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (500 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (310 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
Model | Commander | Hac |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5652 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1331 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2520 mm |