2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Megane would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 158 kg more than 2002 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (105 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2002 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2002 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2002 Renault Megane | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Commander | Megane |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 358 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 527 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 18.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |