2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota ES 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota ES 3 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1343 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota ES 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Commander | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2320 mm |
