2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (347 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (520 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | Commander | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 347 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 520 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2610 mm |