2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 597 kg more than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Commander | 100 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 8998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 2640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |
