2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.

Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Commander 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Commander MX-Flexa
Year Released 2009 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5654 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 358 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 527 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 4350 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2760 mm