2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2005 Spyker C8
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2005 Spyker C8.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 2005 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Jeep | Spyker |
| Model | Commander | C8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 4.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2305 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 100 L |
