2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (230 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Commander | Raider |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5652 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.5 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 83 L |