2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (171 HP @ 3300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara.

Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (453 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (231 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara has manual transmission. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Commander 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara
Make Jeep Suzuki
Model Commander Grand Vitara
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4701 cc 2734 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 305 HP 171 HP
Engine RPM 5650 RPM 3300 RPM
Torque 453 Nm 231 Nm
Torque RPM 3950 RPM 3300 RPM
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 15.7 L/100km 10.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 66 L