2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2007 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Commander. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Commander.

Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (319 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Commodore. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2007 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2007 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: