2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2007 Mazda CX-7

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-7 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2007 Mazda CX-7. (244 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda CX-7.

Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda CX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda CX-7. (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda CX-7.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Commander 2007 Mazda CX-7
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Commander CX-7
Year Released 2009 2007
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5652 cc 2299 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 322 HP 244 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 500 Nm 351 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99.5 mm 87.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.9 mm 94 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 55 L