2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (210 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.

Because 2009 Jeep Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jeep Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2008 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2008 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Commander 2008 Ford Ecosport
Make Jeep Ford
Model Commander Ecosport
Year Released 2009 2008
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3701 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 210 HP 109 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4228 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1679 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2490 mm