2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL would be higher. At 6,208 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL (518 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Commander. (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL (631 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Commander. (453 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Commander | CL |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 6208 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 518 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 453 Nm | 631 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 90 L |