2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2008 Peugeot 1007
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Peugeot 1007. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Peugeot 1007 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (229 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2008 Peugeot 1007. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2008 Peugeot 1007. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1062 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 1007. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Peugeot 1007. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (410 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 1007. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 1007. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2008 Peugeot 1007 has manual transmission. 2008 Peugeot 1007 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 2008 Peugeot 1007 | |
| Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
| Model | Commander | 1007 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 189 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 15.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2305 kg | 1243 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
