2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 925 kg more than 2010 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2010 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2010 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Commander | Megane |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5652 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.4 seconds | 15.9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.5 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 60 L |