2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Commander. (229 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (410 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Commander | 2011 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | Commander | Calais |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
