2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1755 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2011 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2011 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Jeep | Tata |
Model | Commander | Nano |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 191 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 37 L |