2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2012 BMW X3
To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2012 BMW X3. (300 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X3 weights approximately 522 kg more than 2009 Jeep Commander.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW X3. (406 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2012 BMW X3 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | Commander | X3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 358 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 527 Nm | 406 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 1200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4648 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1881 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1675 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 67 L |