2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2012 Citroen C1

To start off, 2012 Citroen C1 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1178 kg more than 2012 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Jeep Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jeep Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C1.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Jeep Commander 2012 Citroen C1
Make Jeep Citroen
Model Commander C1
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5654 cc 998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 358 HP 67 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 527 Nm 93 Nm
Torque RPM 4350 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 2043 kg 865 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 3440 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.7 L/100km 4.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 35 L