2009 Jeep Commander vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (454 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Commander | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Commander | Commodore |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |