2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 107 kg more than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Jeep | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Compass | 6C |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 77 L |