2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1948 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1948 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1948 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1171 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 1948 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Jeep | Maserati |
| Model | Compass | A6G |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 875 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2560 mm |
