2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1949 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1423 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 1949 Maserati A6GCS | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | Compass | A6GCS |
Year Released | 2009 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2320 mm |