2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1953 Packard Patrician
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Packard Patrician. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1953 Packard Patrician has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1953 Packard Patrician will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 1953 Packard Patrician | |
| Make | Jeep | Packard |
| Model | Compass | Patrician |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3230 mm |
