2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1954 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 253 kg more than 1954 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Singer Hunter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 1954 Singer Hunter | |
| Make | Jeep | Singer |
| Model | Compass | Hunter |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2180 mm |
