2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1546 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (220 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Compass | Fronte |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2060 mm |