2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1614 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Compass | Seven |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Body Type | Crossover | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 29 L |