2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1966 Seat 1500
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 883 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 1966 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Jeep | Seat |
Model | Compass | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2660 mm |