2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1968 Renault 8
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1968 Renault 8. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 573 kg more than 1968 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 1968 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Compass | 8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 72 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 40 L |
