2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1982 Nissan Cherry
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 618 kg more than 1982 Nissan Cherry.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Cherry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 1982 Nissan Cherry | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Compass | Cherry |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2400 mm |