2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1273 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Jeep | Zastava |
| Model | Compass | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2160 mm |
