2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Compass | 400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2560 mm |