2009 Jeep Compass vs. 1998 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 423 kg more than 1998 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 1998 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Compass | Cougar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2043 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |