2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 458 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Compass | Clio |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 935 kg |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.9 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
