2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (78 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 258 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2. 2002 Mazda 2 has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda 2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Compass | 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.9 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |