2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota F-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota F-1 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Compass. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 436 kg more than 2002 Toyota F-1.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota F-1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (220 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Compass | F-1 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 75 L |