2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 423 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Jeep Compass | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | Compass | 400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 970 kg |