2009 Jeep Compass vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 178 kg more than 2003 Spyker C8.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Compass | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Jeep | Spyker |
| Model | Compass | C8 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 4170 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 100 L |
